Revision of Income Tax Order

The revision of an Income Tax order is a pivotal process for taxpayers who believe that an income tax assessment order issued by the assessing officer was unjust or unreasonable. Additionally, such orders can be revised to increase the taxpayer's tax liability. The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of the Income Tax Department possesses the authority to enhance, annul, or modify an income tax order if they determine that the interests of the revenue are compromised due to erroneous orders by the Assessing Officer. This article elaborates on the pivotal roles of a Principal Commissioner/Commissioner concerning the revision of income tax orders.

Income Tax Order Revision

The Principal Commissioner/Commissioner has the powers to revise the following income tax orders:

An order of assessment made by the Assessment Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, or other Income Tax Officer based on directions issued by the Joint Commissioner.
An order made by the Joint Commissioner exercising the powers or performing the functions of the Assessing Officer as authorized under Section 120 by the CBDT/Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner/Principal Director/Commissioner.

Errors in Passing of Orders

The Income-tax Act specifies circumstances where an Assessing Officer has erred in passing orders, qualifying them for revision. These circumstances include:

Orders passed without necessary inquiries or verification.
Orders approved allowing relief without investigating the claim.
The order contradicts instructions issued by the Board under Section 119.
The order has not been aligned with any decision by the jurisdictional High Court in the case of the assessee or others that are prejudicial to the assessee.

Time Limit for Revision of Income Tax Order

The assessment orders must be revised within two years from the date of the original order. The following periods are excluded when calculating the limitation period:

The time spent providing an opportunity for the assessee to be re-heard.
Any duration during which any proceeding under this section is stayed by a court order or injunction.

It is important to note that revisionary orders can be issued even after the two-year period under exceptional circumstances.

Procedure for Revision of Income Tax Order

The process involves several powers and considerations by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner during an income tax order revision:

Examination of Records

The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner can call for and examine records of any proceedings under the Income Tax Act. This can be done without providing any reason.

Entitled to Revise Parts of Other Orders

They are entitled to revise other parts of the order that might have been ignored by the Assessing Officer.

Errors of Fact/Errors of Law

The Principal Commissioner/Commissioner can revise errors, whether they are of fact or law.

Opportunity to be Heard

In line with many provisions of the Income Tax Act, the assessee must be given an opportunity to be heard before passing the revised order.

Opinion of Subordinates Valued

The review can proceed even if pointed out by a subordinate, provided the Principal Commissioner/Commissioner agrees with the cause.

Approval from a Higher Rank Authority

The Principal Commissioner/Commissioner might undertake a review of any order at the discretion of a higher authority.

When Income Tax Orders Cannot Be Revised

The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner cannot revise an income tax order if it is under appeal. Additionally, they are restricted from revisiting any orders passed by the High Court, even if considered erroneous. Understanding the types of income tax assessment involved in such orders is crucial.

Back to Learn

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Revision of Income Tax Order by Principal Commissioner.

The purpose of revising an Income Tax order is to correct any errors or unreasonable assessments made by the Assessing Officer if the taxpayer feels that the order was unjust or if the interests of the revenue are at stake due to erroneous passing of orders.

A Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of the Income Tax Department is empowered with the rights to enhance, annul, or modify an income tax order if they feel it is necessary.

A Principal Commissioner or Commissioner can revise an order of assessment made by the Assessment Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, or other Income Tax Officer based on the directions issued by the Joint Commissioner. They can also revise an order made by the Joint Commissioner in the exercise of their powers as an Assessing Officer.

An Income Tax order can be revised if the Assessing Officer passed the order without making necessary inquiries or verification, allowed relief without investigating the claim, or if the order is not in accordance with the Board's instructions or a High Court decision.

Orders of the Assessment Officer must be revised within a period of two years from the date of the original order, excluding the time taken for providing an opportunity to the assessee for re-hearing or any stay order by a court.

A Principal Commissioner or Commissioner can call for and examine records, revise other parts of the order ignored by the Assessing Officer, revise errors of fact or law, and seek opinions from subordinates or higher authorities.

A Principal Commissioner or Commissioner cannot revise an income tax order that is subject to appeal or an order passed by the High Court, even if they consider it erroneous.

The procedure for revising an Income Tax order involves examining records, providing an opportunity for the assessee to be heard, considering opinions from subordinates or higher authorities, and passing a revised order.

Yes, an Income Tax order can be revised in a manner that causes enhancement of the taxpayer's tax liability if the Commissioner or Principal Commissioner deems it necessary.

Yes, revisionary orders can be passed even after the expiry of two years under certain extraordinary circumstances, although the article does not specify what those circumstances might be.