Lok Adalat

Lok Adalat, commonly referred to as the 'People’s Court', is a unique component of India’s legal system, providing an alternative mechanism for dispute resolution. It serves as a platform for resolving cases pending in courts or at the pre-litigation stage, in a manner recognized under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. This article offers a comprehensive look at the Lok Adalat mechanism, its powers, limitations, and different levels.

Decrees and Appeals

The legal framework of Lok Adalat allows for settling disputes by mediation, granting resolutions the same enforceability as a civil court decree. Decisions made by a Lok Adalat are final and binding; however, they can be contested in the case of fraud. A party unsatisfied with a Lok Adalat's decision can challenge it by filing a writ petition to the High Court. For more about alternate dispute resolution mechanisms, explore the Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme.

Court Fee

There is no fee for filing a case in Lok Adalat. If a case is transferred from another court to Lok Adalat for resolution, the initial fee paid is refunded. However, such a refund is not applicable to cases concerning MSME and arbitration, which fall outside the Lok Adalat’s jurisdiction. Learn more about how arbitration is handled under the Company Rules Mediation and Conciliation.

Powers and Restrictions

Members of the Lok Adalat act as statutory counselors tasked with helping parties reach an out-of-court settlement amicably. They can only assist without applying pressure to compromise, ensuring that resolutions are reached through voluntary consensus. To understand the legal basis for such mediations, refer to the Arbitration Conciliation Amendment Bill 2019.

Nature of Cases

Lok Adalat is applicable for resolving cases that are:

Not yet filed in any court.
At the pre-litigation stage.
Expected to be filed in court shortly.

Note: Non-compoundable offenses and divorce cases are not admissible in Lok Adalat. For more details on effective dispute resolution processes, see the E-Dispute Resolution Scheme.

Levels of Lok Adalat

Lok Adalat operates at various levels:

State Authority

The State Legal Services Authority organizes Lok Adalat at the state level, with each bench comprising a sitting or retired High Court judge and a qualified social worker.

High Court

In the High Court, Lok Adalat benches include a judicial officer and a social worker, organized by the High Court Legal Services Committee.

District

At the district level, the Digital Legal Services Authority organizes Lok Adalat, consisting of a judicial officer and a legal social activist.

Taluk

The Taluk Legal Services Committee manages Taluk level Lok Adalats, featuring benches with a judicial officer and a social worker. For information on dispute resolution at various levels, review the Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme.

Types of Lok Adalats

There are three primary types of Lok Adalats:

National Lok Adalat
Permanent Lok Adalat
Mobile Lok Adalat

National Lok Adalat

These are national events where Lok Adalats are convened across the country simultaneously, from the Supreme Court to the Taluka level, to facilitate the settlement of cases.

Permanent Lok Adalat

Permanently provides a pre-litigative mechanism for settlement of public utility service cases like transport and postal. If consensus is not achieved, the dispute is addressed outside criminal offense considerations. Discover more about related mechanisms in the Sabka Vishwas Dispute Resolution Scheme.

Mobile Lok Adalat

These are held at various locations across the country on different dates, making the legal process more accessible. Mobile Lok Adalats ensure justice reaches the remotest corners, enhancing legal service outreach. For related insights, explore the Farmers Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Dispute Resolution Rules 2020.

Back to Learn

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Lok Adalat Mechanism in India: Alternative Dispute Resolution.

A Lok Adalat, which means 'People's Court' in English, is an alternative dispute resolution mechanism in India. It is a forum where disputes or cases pending in the court of law or at the pre-litigation stage are resolved through a compromise or settlement between the parties.

The Lok Adalat mechanism was granted statutory status under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and is governed by the same Act.

Yes, the decisions of a Lok Adalat are final and binding upon the parties to a dispute/case. The decrees issued by a Lok Adalat have the same powers as that of a civil court decree and are enforceable for execution.

The decision of a Lok Adalat can be challenged in the instance of fraud by filing a writ petition to the concerned High Court. However, the scope for challenging a Lok Adalat decision is limited.

No, there is no court fee for matters filed in a Lok Adalat. If a case pending in the court is brought to the Lok Adalat for resolution, the court fee initially paid by the petitioner is refunded.

A Lok Adalat can resolve cases that are not pending before any court, disputes at the pre-litigation stage, and disputes that are likely to be filed before the court. However, it cannot settle issues related to non-compoundable offenses or matters of divorce.

Lok Adalats are organized at various levels, including State, High Court, District, and Taluk levels. Each level has its own bench composition, typically involving a sitting or retired judicial officer and a qualified social worker.

The three main types of Lok Adalats are National Lok Adalat, Permanent Lok Adalat, and Mobile Lok Adalat. National Lok Adalats are held across the country on a single day, Permanent Lok Adalats deal with public utility service disputes, and Mobile Lok Adalats are held at different locations on different dates.

The members of a Lok Adalat are vested with the task of deciding the cases brought to the body. They act as statutory councilors and are required to assist the parties in an independent and impartial manner to reach an amicable settlement of disputes.

No, Lok Adalat members cannot pressurize or coerce the parties to compromise or settle cases, either directly or indirectly. Their role is to persuade the parties to reach an out-of-court consensus through mutual agreement.